@greybeard said in [[template]].: @tsaukpaetra Pedo. Anti-pedo, what are you interpreting?

@asdf said in How Do I Security: I wish my bank would do that. I recently purchased a large number of MP3s on Google Play Music. Since there is no cart functionality in the shop, that means loads of small transactions. Get yourself a gift card? Or use Google Opinions to earn a bit of credit. I've got about £20 that I really should get round to spending

@bb36e said in Great censorship, Microsoft: @Tsaukpaetra you're able to filter out irrelevant small scale patterns and instead see large scale ones? Isn't that the point of more data? @Dreikin said in Great censorship, Microsoft: @Tsaukpaetra said in Great censorship, Microsoft: @Lorne-Kates said in Great censorship, Microsoft: @Tsaukpaetra said in Great censorship, Microsoft: Is it just me, or are the censor-blurred sections completely readable? If you squint. I never understood this. How does reducing the amount of input improve clarity? Smaller aperture increases depth of field. There are, of course, limits and counfounders to the benefit of the effect, but it comes down to looking through a smaller pinhole increases sharpness at the expense of brightness. It does this by increasing collimation by filtering out light rays outside some collimation boundary, with a smaller aperture having stronger filtering. More info here and here. Now that's a good example!